Quoted By:
Ok let's go through this.
For as much as this Sky person likes accusing Roopy of using manipulation tactics, he does the exact same things.
>Zum's initial announcement...held undeniable truth
What makes it undeniable? You're not offering any proof either way.
>Roo's version of events paints a grim picture...and a disturbing lack of evidence
Nobody involved in any of this drama has provided a shred of evidence. Only calling out Roopy for this is ridiculous. In fact the only thing that all parties agree to is that Koko is not a woman.
>One must wonder why Roo waited until now to bring this up...is there a more self-serving motive at play?
You lead the readers on with this pointed question but then fail to bring up how this drama in any way benefits Roopy throughout the rest of your wall of text.
>This is not the behavior of someone seeking truth and justice, but of someone trying to sway the court of public opinion
And why did Zum post a picture of her thighs? I'm sure that was relevant to the discussion right?
>Roo's claim that she shared this information with me and Zum 'with proof' is misleading. The 'proof' provided was not conclusive and was largely based on her personal interpretations and feelings
Impossible to believe this without seeing the so-called 'proof.' Moreover calling someone out for not providing any evidence and then expecting people to believe your words, also without any evidence, is a bad look.
>I can poke holes in her story all day, but I think you get the idea
In a response that is 3x longer than Roopy's discord post you spent 90% of it calling her manipulative and then end by saying you can poke tons of holes in her story. Why wouldn't you have just done that instead of all this other irrelevant word smithing?