>>83689899No doom about it; I wouldn't have asked otherwise. Anybody, and certainly the denizens of this thread, are free to embrace the AI of the present and future howsoever they choose, and the answers I have received are more than sufficient evidence. My first question has also answered itself.
>"3 years"Fake rumao. Reps. I'll even give you picrel as a hint.
>>83691618Haven't seen you in some time. Have you opted for somewhere local instead of jumping national lines, or did you sort out the EU medical coverage issue?
