>>7288828>Fascism>Capitalism>Anti-CapitalismOr maybe I understand all three and reject the Marxist meme definition of capitalism (muh wage labor) because it's so broad that it encompasses literally every kind of societal organization that isn't "Jews in Catalonia or spooks in Kurdistan running around blowing shit up until the fascists put it down". It's always good for a laugh when some brainlet wannabe Bolshevik calls Rome or Imperial Russia capitalist or claims that the USSR and China were/are not socialist.
Fascist Italy was the second-most nationalized state in the world next to the Soviets, don't come at me with this "capitalism in decay" Trot shit.
>think idpol liberals are the bulk of the left nowThey are, unfortunately, just like liberals that want to keep it 1890 forever are the bulk of the so-called right. At least we're on the outside because you and your capitalist buddies teamed up to fuck us- all you've got to blame is a bunch of sellout Jews (and like, literal actual Jews, not "things I don't like are Jewish") that decided to ditch class struggle for sexual degeneracy.
>The bourgeoisie support intersectionality, social democracy, and identity politics for the same reason that the bourgeoisie supported the NSDAP in the late 30's in Germany, and create a labor aristocracy so as to keep actual proletarians from achieving revolutionOr maybe the reason people in the early 20th century supported the fascist movements was because they were offered the option of supporting a kind of socialism without also having to hate their nation. The bourgeoisie as an actual social class (the factory boss that owns the factory, the shopkeeper that owns the shop) is almost dead anyway thanks to the rise of finance capitalism so let's not pretend 99% of the people pushing globohomo are private property owners.
>and more so recognizing that private property DOES in fact exist, and it needs to be dealt withBy selling it off to the revolution's creditors, lmao