>>7623653>9/10. Aesthetic and the animations are nice. Agree that you should move the music controls.Thanks, animations are what I love most about making homescreens and that's where most of the effort usually goes.
Like yours a lot. Fits the square phone and the weeb future magic is gimmicky, but a cool touch regardless.
>>7637770>i dont feel like it works as well as the pape, but a nice try!Thanks, Here's a slightly updated version, but I think I'll move on to something else soon.
>i havent made any progress.What's holding you back?
>>7638110>i don't like the position of those music controls but everything else is amazingMe neither, changed it to webm related almost right away.
Yours kinda looks like a keygen that'll give malware. If that was the look you where going bfor: good job.
>>7640402p boring/10
>>7639574I can appreciate the effort, but it looks really bland. Though I'll admit I just don't like "fake 3D" designs like this in general.
>>7639391Work on your consistency. Font sizes are all over the place, app icons don't fit anything else, all boxes have hard corners, while the search bar is round, etc.
>>7638517Nice colors
>>7632416>My first home screenIt shows, but keep trying. For starters pick an icon pack that matches the pape more, or get rid of icons completely (use text or app drawer instead). Also make sure you don't clutter your screen with redundant information: either hide your status bar or don't put info that's up there on your homescreen aswell.
>>7631510Saved for inspo
>>7630885Do you have a small phone? Otherwise those icons are quite big and maybe a bit to far up to comfortably reach, don't you think?
>>7628819Jo, this is pretty neat. Did you so the grid like
>>7619008 suggested?
Also animations are a bit slow. What I like to do is set a global variable for animation speed and make all animations use that. Makes it way easier to quickly change it until you're happy with it.
>>7623448Ruined by the white info text imo