>>868482You keep appealing to some kind of "objective quality", but you offer no evidence that such a thing exists. Conversely, there clearly are people who enjoy the stylistic choices you're decrying as objectively bad, as is evidenced by how much money they're spending.
Prima facie, it would seem that they're right (because there's evidence their art sells for millions PA) and your wrong (because there's not been any evidence presented that yours does).
