>>104541061No, none of them are calling for violence, and if they were (which again they aren't), they'd be retaliating after the responses Charlie Kirk's assassination got and the calls for more.
That anon is just another asshole upset the right decided to stop being nice, and decided to be assholes too and start weaponizing numbers to hit back, and several /smug/ chuubas are pretty okay with rightoids cancelling leftoids for, once again this point needs to be made,
>"celebrating the assassination of a political commentator, and calling for more people to die like he did." I really don't give a shit if this is hypocritical, either. No justification on my part, if you could convince me it's hypocritical all I'd say is "yeah."
