>>23805363i have no doubt that is what your "translation" says anon.
try reading it in the original greek, only do so with the advice i have just given you. read it from the lens that those are jewish writers, writing about jewish characters. and it suddenly start making alot more sense. why the kid was wearing only a bandaid (forcible circumcision of slaves), why he ran from both the cops and the followers of jesus, why a murderer is freed over jesus/why a town which just celebrated him and welcomed him not even a day prior suddenly turned on him (because he drew unnecessary heat onto jews with his pedorast activities), why he was crucified in between two other child traffickers (because its jews, and that was and still is actually a problem), why the church uses pedophile symbols, why theres pederast artwork everywhere and even statues built onto the churches itself.
however much sense the bible makes to you now, and i promise, like i said before, it will make 1000x more sense if you look at it all from this perspective, THE WHOLE WORLD will begin making more sense, why there are pedophiles running everything, why jews are in such an elevated position. all of it.
and im not even going to point out that in your defense of the pederast implications, youre accepting the homosexual implications. like its okay if its a man and not a boy? its still jewish faggotry. but i just want to reiterate, jesus never existed. this is just a story they invented, initially for jews themselves, but whose priorities had shifted towards gentiles, which is why the naked boy abruptly disappears from the later gospels. read them in chronological order, its much easier to see how they editorialized the story over time.
