>>17015879Sounds incredibly stupid because the emperor doesn't have any ethical belief system. He's just a megalomaniac who constructs his own demise and screeches all the way to his life support existence.
>: if you make a satire of something, yet do too good (bad?) of a job with it to the point your opposition takes a liking to your product, maybe—just maybe— you accidentally created something which contains attributes the opposition lionizes.Only if the "opposistion" is retarded would that actually be the case. Also, you said it yourself that most of the people who like this are centrists (liberals) and therefore they don't actually think the empire is admirable and just suspend their belief to engage in mindless entertainment. The "right-wingers" you mentioned aren't right-wingers, they're just retarded
>The largest consumers of Starship Troopers and Warhammer 40K (and Lord of the Rings / many other fantasy or fictional shit) are white men, and usually centralist (which are treated as right-wingers nowadays) or conservative leaningNot necessarily, you should stop making pointless assumptions and base your identity on consumer crap. Maybe you guys should stop playing with toys and giving money to progressive companies?
>especially if they do in fact contain any masculine idealsWhich, again, warhammer does not. You are basing your identity on toys again. Also I don't enjoy warhammer. I think the setting is retarded which is what I've been trying to tell you. People who think GW hasn't always been progressive are delusional.
Despite all that, warhams is just a dumb setting liked by manchildren. And I don't give a shit about some Hollywood celebrity.