>>9414979>Another possibility is that Atlantis may actually have beenThe main landmass we refer to now-a-days as "Pangaea". There are a few parallels in other "myths". If you want a better understanding, you're going to have to forget a lot of the bull shit that they tricked you into believing "we know" happened. Virtually the entire timeline they've shoved down our throats has been a complete fabrication.
What were they trying to hide? Evidence of the catastrophes.
Anything else? How the Electromagnetic Force has played a MAJOR role in the "Creative" process.
Prior to the start of the catastrophes, the Earth was very different than the world we know. Our planet used to be a tidally locked body, orbiting a flaring red dwarf star, during the earlier stages of life. The landmass actually broke apart rather quickly, after the moon crashed into our atmosphere. There are many "myths" that talk about this. And if you've ever looked at the shape of the continents and various geological features, there is actually a world of evidence that points right back to such a cataclysmic scenario.
If this sounds far fetched, look at how frequently tidally locking occurs throughout our own solar system. If you're not sure what "tidal locking" is exactly, look at our moon. One side faces us at all times. It's also "shallow" in comparison to the "far-side". If one were to put enough water on the moon, there would be an ocean facing Earth at all time, and a main landmass facing away, out into space. That's how our planet used to orbit it's parent star, which was different than the sun we have today.
I would need several posts to fully explain, but try to understand that such a catastrophic event would definitely have the ability to separate the continents, far quicker than the slow process they claim based off the current rates we observe today. There was a huge arc discharge that occurred which locked our moon into orbit, almost instantaneously.
