>>5066269>The last one.ah, okay then. well, anyway, you might find this huge ass article useful then.
https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2018/04/24/the-jewish-question-an-empirical-examiniation/it's much too big to be read in a single go, but it's useful as a reference tool and for jumping around between sections and subheadings. such as hitting ctrl+f and typing "media" or "political views" etc.
it's excellently sourced except for one oxford study that requires you to pay 30 eur. bur nobody will ever accuse you of using biased sources, that's for sure.
the main source is this book from a philo-semite
http://cnqzu.com/library/Philosophy/neoreaction/Richard%20Lynn/The%20Chosen%20People.pdf>when you own literally all the media and can pick and choose what kind of stories are focused on.yeah well, that's true, but you still probably need a plant for all the cameras to focus on. shocking how easy it is to discredit a movement by associating it with undesirables
