>>9520292Right. I've seen that before. It's a cherry picked one, though, and doesn't hold up much upon closer inspection. A quick search will reveal that Michael Rogers talked to Trump, reported by various media around June somewhere of that year, before he got fired (in fact, his opposition to the others seem to be the reason that he did get fired). Anyone could've successfully speculated in mid-June that the NSA, being opposed to the CIA and friends, would work against them in a scheme devised to discredit them (Snowden being a CIA operative that after years of working with them, joined the NSA and all of a sudden had a change of heart).
More, please. I'd like something that isn't an obvious extrapolation from already avaliable information, if possible. Since Q has predicted so much, and proof is so important, these should be easy to produce.
