>>14580869i could see that working in a more ideal society
but imagine someone writing a logically flawless book
society rejects it because some of its themes are offensive
writing such a book requires eliminating personal biases, but will the people do the same when it's time to read it and discuss it?
most people probably won't because like you've said in
>>14580329 regular and below average people outweigh the rational ones
the problem persists
