>>8817018>And you are trying to make "muh jew" bs look like it´s done by real anons? Try harder, clown.>Q does not agree, POTUS does not agree, Jared Kushner and Ivanke do not agree.Wtf are you rambling about?
>And you are trying to make "muh jew" bs look like it´s done by real anons? With what?
A screencap of an analysis by an Anon who states Q has a very high chance of being legit, that it behaves exaclty in the opposite way of MSM tacticts?
I am telling you
why the fuck are you fighting everyone in this thread?