>>11103618You're a child posting fictional memes, seething at historic facts.
>"In 1997, the German Institute for Archaeology headed an excavation of the tombs of the nobles in Thebes-West, Upper Egypt. At this time, three types of tissues were sampled from different mummies: meniscus (fibrocartilage), skin, and placenta. Archaeological findings suggest that the mummies dated from the New Kingdom (approximately1550_/1080 BC)..... The basal epithelial cells were packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin.">Early southern predynastic Egyptian crania show tropical African affinities, displaying craniometric trends that differ notably from the coastal northern African pattern. The various craniofacial patterns discernible in northern Africa are attributable to the agents of microevolution and migration.>Classic Greek scholars described Egyptians as "melanoderms" in their own terms. But even the ancient Egyptians in many occasions depicted themselves much darker that folks from southwest Asia and Europe. Now, we know from skeletal remains, that ancient Egyptian specimens, particularly from Upper Egypt, were described as 'tropical body plans'. This naturally implies the same for skin tone, if skin were attached to the bones. However, if this were not enough, given that we were not there in dynastic Egypt, and for those, who don't care to take classical Greek scholars to their word, this is how the Kemetians themselves depicted themselves then... Of course, why would the egyptians make false representations of themselves?! The Africanity of Egypt is also confirmed through portraiture, notice how the eurocentrists get silent whenever we bring up a portrait of Menes or Djoser, and Khufu instead of, how Keita put it " portraits of late dynastic greek/roman conquerors". 