>>12543666I don't know how you guys can spend so much time thinking about the natural order of things, and somehow come to the conclusion that the natural order is best represented by 18th century England/19th Century USA/modern Pakistan etc. The natural order of human interaction is seen in the kind of conditions we evolved in; the tribe of a few hundred hunter-gatherers. Humans are a highly sexually dimorphic species, indicating that the roles of men and women have always differed, however in a primitive society women would not be confined to the hut. They would hunt and gather like everyone else, and often play a reasonably large role in rituals and ceremonies.
A perfect example of a sexism fail is the state of health in countries where women have to cover up. Men think it's a great idea because it solves several issues relating to masculine insecurity, however these women get vitamin D deficient, and vitamin D during pregnancy is necessary for a healthy child. Thus, there are thousands of Muslim manlets running around that might've had stronger bones and larger frames if only their culture had thought about the natural order of things.
Hating white women is what the Jews want you to do, when really we should be working together to build an ethical society in which animals are cared for, and women and children are not beaten because they aren't as strong/capable/intelligent as adults/men. There is nothing I can say to convince any of you incels that women aren't emotional, manipulative, stupid histrionics, however I'm sure there are those in this thread that know women are capable of kindness. Regardless of the utility of something, if it is kind and good then it is only right to be kind and good towards that thing.
Don't forget, if you ever manage to mate with a woman she will contribute half the genes to your offspring. So, assuming all women are retarded, venomous succubi and marrying/dating accordingly will only result in feral cunt children.
