>>11574880>>11574907>>11574909'Internal dialogue' is such a bullshit concept, from over-socialised idiots who watch too much TV and think that people think in words IRL just because they do on the screen. I guess you faggots can't ever experience anything that can't be summed up in a single word, eh? As a baby, before you learnt language, you guys just never had a single thought? lol.
My advice for you: Drop acid. Then you will see just how limitless your mind is and how frivolous and shallow words are; real genius is thinking in indescribable sensations and symbolism, being intimately in touch with your instincts. That's the way you limit the latency between your mind and your surroundings, and you connect with the present moment rather than getting lost in the imprecise abstraction of words
>>11574879100% correct - how the fuck can words ever express something not inherently 'basic' anyway? I mean, poets work for decades trying to wield the cumbersome tool of language to express things effectively; language is ass and if you're bound by it, you have less mental complexity than the average dog. Imagine unironically being programmed so fundamentally by society that your consciousness perceives stimuli only as a series of syllables
