>>15932774I guess you get the point, so, yeah. It's alright to go different places and leave some things behind, to keep life pumping. Even if you feel like you'll be staying content, one day you may just crack and feel immense regret that you didn't do more with things before. Not saying that you can't simply enjoy staying where you are, also, but in your particular case, I feel like what I'm saying goes.
But, anyhow, even after you leave, you could still keep contact with those friends if they were close enough, bring your dog along to wherever you'll be going, and even eventually return to visit those places that you knew. Not everything will disappear once you physically leave it behind.
Overall, I feel that you'll just be happier once you're somewhere else, so, don't worry about it.
>What are they expecting, putting me up to this?They just assume that everything, and I mean everything, is possible in the exact same way that they did in their time. Bizarre how hard it is for people to comprehend that not being the case. So, don't expect any slack.
Good to hear that you're somewhat confident about it, though. Even if you won't be very comfortable with it, at least you'll be staying afloat until you can move on with things in the way that you want. You'll make it.
Also, one thing that got stuck in my mind,
>55+ communitiesI don't get that. Are you just simply not allowed to buy a house around there unless you're over 55? Why? And that's okay with everybody? That's just the old people's turf? Is it community enforced, or an official thing? Either way, that just sounds bizarre to me. I guess it's a thing placed in there to support the elderly, which I suppose is alright and all, but, still.
Anyway, that's whatever, the real question I have is, why 55+? It couldn't be 54? Or 50? Or mid-forties? Mid-forties is an old age, right? Or, is this a retirement thing? I don't know if people retire in their mid-forties, so, eh. But, okay, why 50 instead off 55? Part 2.
