>>10724198You did not answer all of my questions.
What is truth?
Can we observe it?
>2+2=4Well, it is simple here, but what about this
>0.99999999... = 1 The problem is that if there are not objective statements in math then it discredits the whole idea that math proves the existence of an objective truth. Math is just a system which we humans created and it doesn't exist in nature.
And to which degree can you be certain that some of the "truths" are objective?
In reality you cannot be sure 100% of anything because of limitations of your biological organism. Thus you can't ever prove that something is objective.
The correct way is to say as an example:
A thing "A" is 99% correct given the current information.
