>>12939958>That's why I don't see atheism as a logical worldview. Atheism isn't a single world view, atheists may vary greatly in what they believe and their motivations for being atheist in the first place with the only common factor being lack of belief in any god.
>You have to assume a lot of things about modern science are objective truth Such as?
>and ignore facts like "Monkyes couldn't have sailed 900 miles on a raft made of vegetation"No one is saying that this must be true, there are other more prevalent explanations that elaborate on how life made it to the New World, from migrations across the bearing straits to Pangea shifting over time via tectonic plates.
>Don't get me started on the flaw with radio carbon dating no one seems to acknowledge (that no one has ever sat down for hundreds of years and measured the half life of a carbon atom) and that it's impossible to know the exact weight of an archilogical find when it was new.That's not how it works. Carbon dating works with the Carbon-14 which is an isotope which is a forms of the carbon that contain 6 protons but different numbers of neutrons in their nucei. It has been measured to have a half life of 5,700 years, meaning in that time frame half of it would have decayed. since carbon will decay at a CONSTANT rate, this can be measured to date how long something has been decaying for, and is used to measure things such as trees. Carbon-14 dating won't work on dinosaur bones since the Carbon content in them has LONG decayed, but can use Some of the isotopes used for this purpose are uranium-238, uranium-235 and potassium-40 dating each of which has a half-life of more than a million years.
>Throw in the fact that fossils are bullshit and no one has ever found a complete dino skelly and the whole thing stinks.This is just plain false man, don't know what else to say about that. It's like saying no one has seen a Dolphin before. We have even found partially frozen mammoths on ice.