>>10344867You don't answer loaded questions with a yes or no (like you did like a moron - admitting to raping children) you argue with their assumption. (which even you tried to do once you realized what a retard you were for answering no or yes, with that "I've never done it")
Here's that wikipedia you plebbiters love so much: >A common way out of this argument is not to answer the question (e.g. with a simple 'yes' or 'no'), but to challenge the assumption behind the question. To use an earlier example, a good response to the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" would be "I have never beaten my wife".[5] This removes the ambiguity of the expected response, therefore nullifying the tactic. However, the asker is likely to respond by accusing the one who answers of dodging the question.
Oh look, it even has your response to it. LMAO truly a retard..
