>>8066692>If you, or the people on /pol/ knew anything about Popper you would know he changed his views on evolution.I know, he wanted to keep that cushy academia job so he cucked with lip service. Notice that he says
>Nevertheless, I have changed my mind about the testability and logical status of the theory of natural selectionhe mentions "theory of natural selection" not "evolution" to keep some fingers crossed intellectual integrity.
>>8066693>Can you predict where every molecule in a cloud will go? If not, clouds don't exist. That is your argument.its not, but I can predict where clouds will go. Its called meteorology.
>>8066694>Polydactyly isn't a trait that presents over multiple generations.I know, but it could have, bigots of old eras probably called first snakes with wings with bigotted terms but now we have birds...
>>8066696>homosexuality is infact an adaptation to ovderpopulation.are you sure, doesnt it lower the chances of survival of the group since aids and resources lost on non natalist form of sexuality?
>>8066695>In general you can tell they cling to their evolution. They want it real bad. Anything they can come up with and can put a PhD behind to impress people will be done to keep it credible.Academics are human mice. I cant wait until they finally mutate into rats.
