>>21923097no the best way to prove a globe would to take one of the ten thousand satellites we have in "outer space" and turn them around and show us a live 24/7 feed of the GLOBE from "outer space", instead of gay little up close ISS footage that cuts out constantly (for some reason?)
there is no "proving the globe" because we do not exist on a 3959 mile radius sphere. we see too far and this is verified by curvature tests like line of sight observations where we see 10x farther than we should, high distance mirror flashes, high distance mirror flashes, shooting radio signals out 8000 miles which should be impossible on a globe (they invented skywave propagation and the ionosphere to have a cope for why the signal must have "bounced off of something and been reflected back down to earth"), infrared observations of faraway mountains etc. the proof that we are not on a 3959 mile radius sphere is insane
not to mention all the experiments that prove we are not spinning at all such as highly precise interferometry that has been repeated literally (literally) millions of times, cosmic radiation measurements, experiments like airy's that prove we are geostationary
the sheer concept of "space" where there is no matter but somehow motion is communicated between "nothingness" is fucking retarded. the "proof" for things like gravity is nonexistent because for example when our observations for gravity were wrong by 99% in the 1930s, fritz zwicky instead of saying "maybe we got the formula wrong" instead filled in the number for the missing mass of the coma cluster as "something that has to be there but we can't touch, see, observe or interact with it in any way". this number for missing mass is now called "dark matter" and its totally just based on bad math for gravity
to defend the globe at this point is just because you're a faggot globe shill or you're ignorant and retarded, and personally i think its both
