>>10896898I was going by activity, as in top of the speed chart. Hard to say what the best in terms of quality would be. One of the slowest ones, I guess. Speaking of slow, I was reading on /qa/ about suggestions for actually useful boards. One of them was to create a general art board for things likes sculputers or painting that don't fit in the drawing boards. But if they made it, /po/ would go too. I don't know how I feel about getting rid of a board that, while it is a failure, has a nice atmosphere despite that. Arguably should've been merged years ago, though.
>Can you understand what people are talking about on 2chan?Not really. Not enough for me to consider using it, anyway. I'm just as bad at it as Moona, yay...
Why was the encounter so awkward if you already knew each other?
