Quoted By:
Generalized description in regards of mental insanity: A total in which insanity or delusion is considered to be the level of deviant abstraction within a limited set of preconditions that determine objective reality. This total is divided into three sub-totals that work as one. The first total is [A] Whatever exists on its own with or without our perception translating it by processing the data (the true nature of the universe/the environment outside of our mental horizon), Whatever is solely a creation of our consciousness (dreams, thoughts), [C] Whatever is a result of the interaction between [A] and (the specific way in which we perceive space-time, the version of the environment that's accessible to our understanding) that produces experience. The way our logic works allows it to distinguish [A] from via the contribution of [C], which helps us understand what's the basis and what is based on it. So the preconditions are: whether or not something that our logic classifies as [C] is truly [C] or a pseudo-imitation of [C] produced by a malfunction within the sub-total, along with the justification of such a distinguishment for the determination of insanity. And here's where the contribution of shared experiences takes place in order to make this procedure easier. If the nature of our experiences is not identical to the nature of experiences of the rest of the people, then it's safe to classify such experiences as an invalid interaction between the [A] and sub-wholes, resulting in [C] not satisfying the criteria of objectivity due to not meeting the standards that regard: [A] always being the basis of , indicating deviant abstraction, thus proving insanity. However, the classification of insanity and delusion is significantly harder for the person who's suffering from it, due to his spirit being already used to the experience of such malfunctions, to the point it considers the fake version of reality that's produced by them as given data.
