Quoted By:
Is it safe to say the news actively suppresses disclosure?
We could have learned a lot from the Kyle Odom case.
The news would have discovered the synthetic telepathy programs and how they are run with supercomputers, AI, and antennas.
They would have discovered timeline branches, manifestation technology, and all of the other things Odom witnessed.
Dr. Steven Greer could have been interviewed to get his expert opinion on the actual laws of physics and the current state of technology.
Dr. Robert Duncan could have been interviewed to inform the public on the open use of the synthetic telepathy systems.
Odom could have been declared innocent, and we would have been safer because of it.
Instead, the news is stuck in the "is havana syndrome real?" and "are ufos real?" phase of the investigation.
We could be discussing far more interesting things such as the mind over matter physics, the observation of hyperspace, and the checks and balances necessary to regulate black projects.
