>>13588971>Define "post-Bible.not written or directly inspired by the entourage of the world's favorite homeless working class Jewish pre-psychiatry schizoid born out of wedlock.
>and there is nothing wrong with adopting the insights of noble pagans.because a select anthology of incoherence base on non-intellectual servile Messianism and the equivalent of Judaic-tinged promissory lifecoaching for the underclass isn't satiating for most people (especially with the advent of widespread compulsory education and access to "culture" and those with their basics needs more than met) and it would be taboo and damning to engage in a more unbridled philosophy back then without referring back to the empire/state-assimilated religio-paradigm (especially considering it's primarily monks, who essentially were state workers and its culture creators and propagandists [not to mention many abandoned children were given or taken by the Church, in cases such as war, and the Church-State was more than a figurative parents for them] and everything would be strained, appropriated, credited, and adorned with and according to the "one and only" truth of their lives [or else]).
