>>18847161>I didn't wrote that at allYeah, I was metaquoting along with what the facts are. The facts ARE that there is no 'holy divine pure language of truth', the truth IS what the facts ARE.
>they thus come from a perfect, ideal (duh) realmYes, thats your problem. "Perfection" is an arbitrary imaginary trait.
>whether you view that as mere imagination Thats what it is. You can't provide evidence to the contrary.
>>18847144 (You)>bible came firstYou are SO FUCKING RETARDED that you're trying to argue that a document assembled by a show of hands in 300 AD or so..
PREDATES
A SIX THOUSAND YEAR OLD story, possibly the oldest myth in the history of the world?
Jesus fuck, you're not just stupid, you're so unbelievably stupid it makes me blink.
I have difficulty believing anybody could be that stupid, including a Brazillian, but there it is, the American flag, right beside your message id.
