>>13757706>Pic related is particularly goldi don't really get what the big deal is. a relationship requires work. why should the woman be the one to manage the relationship? women don't like to be in charge of things.
as a man, if you task your wife with being the one to manage the relationship then you're a retard. if she can do better than why wouldn't she?
>>13757732>She's willing to leave him over something as trivial as thatas trivial as what? the actual relationship itself? you're retarded, and feminine.
men like things. women like people.
a relationship is a thing. your wife is a person. the man should be in charge of the relationship.
>If she isn't in love, why was she with him?marriage is traditionally arranged by the parents. the woman doesn't choose her husband; her father does. so right off the bat the woman has no interest, let alone love, for her husband. and yet, arranged marriages are statistically much more stable. this is because in a traditional society the men aren't a bunch of losers who don't know how to grab a hold of their relationships. the man maintains his relationship as if it were a business endeavor. not like the guy in the OP who just viewed his wife as a person he cares about and nothing more.
the woman in the OP loved her second husband because he actually cares about the relationship itself. if you aren't willing to toss your wife a few bones for the sake of the marriage (which is an entirely separate entity from you or her) then you're a retard.
you're the man. you make the situation. you are responsible for what happens, not her. it's extremely easy to get a woman to stay with you.
treat her like a dog and she'll love you like a dog. you feed your dog every day don't you? you give treats and whatnot? this pleases the dog. toss a few shekels to your wife, schedule a dinner, etc. it's very simple. you're just either retarded or gay
