>>5744419As I said, I don't know.
Could have been the Big Bang, could have been a deity, could have been neither of those two.
But since there are indicators pointing towards something like the Big Bang, CMB for example, it's possible to approximate what might've happened.
>>5744471I didn't even say that I'm an atheist, you just assumed it.
Well, correctly, but you seem to think athism and agnosticism can't work together?
I'm an agnostic atheist, I don't know whether god exists, but since there's no reason to believe it does, I don't.
>>5744515>How fucking retarded does one have to be to not only believe in causalityAgain, when did I say that I do that?
True, the world seems to work causal, but that's only classical physics. Quantum mechanics work differently, they renounce the classical idea of causality.
