>>11387081to be fair twitter started it all by limiting the number of signs you can use, so people were forced to invent and use abbreviations for many common words. And now it has gloriously backfired on them. Not long after 62.6F=C° began, some anon could see where it's all leading to and asked a question
>What are they going to do, ban a letter of the alphabet?They are trying to do some mental gymnastics but are doomed to fail. Anon is anon by definition, you can't just classify a group of anons into some specific class as you please.
>Did you just assume my world view? You Epistemophob!>https://www.congress dot gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/1154/textcomes with obligatory
>muh eidiel saidpotery
