>>19247821>hey you were the guy on /x/ :DYeah, I suppose.
>i love you anon, have a great day <3From one writer to another, you should actually consider other's criticism, and the possibility that you're wrong, unless you're entire message is no different from Schopenhauer. In which case, same as him, you have to formulate some kind of reason for you to not kys, which, regardless of your reasoning, would contradict your entire thesis. thereby refuting it.
But yeah, sure. You, too. Have a good day.
