>>3181269How you "feel" about it shows you don't know a damn thing about what you're talking about. The section of the article that pajeet is trying to overturn does not grant the FCC or the government any new powers in controlling what goes through the internet, it strictly restricts ISPs from offering preferential service to tip the market in their favor. Its entire purpose is to inhibit local monopolies' ability enact anti-competitive policies. There is not a word in the document that says shit about what can and cannot be published to a website. Government censorship enters into the equation at exactly 0%. The comparison to howard stern's being fined for breaking ridiculous obscenity laws (enacted by our beloved, freedom-loving republican congressmen) is completely irrelevant. "restoring freedom to the internet" by repealing net neutrality is newspeak, "patriot act"-tier deception. The title words have waning relevance to the real purpose of the proposals.