>>21002506calling it a long rant doesn't make it wrong, that is not an argument. it lays out in precise detail how one speck of radioactive dust can give you cancer.
and why not both? there are all kinds of messed up things they are pumping into the environment, like atrazine which makes the damn frogs gay. just like with dogs as i posted earlier, many cancers like prostate and breast cancer are mediated by sex hormones. basically when your sex hormones are low you get these.
>But what if it's the radiation pointed at your lungs that causes cancer and smoking actually does nothing because it has no radiation?inhaling radioactive dust has a 100% mortality rate, again i posted this. this is known fact. speculation is fine, just don't mix it up with fact. i speculate that chest x-rays are probably pretty bad for you too.
again, it's not just radiation but specific types of radiation that harm you. bananas are radioactive, and so is the sun and your lawn. in fact the grass is so radioactive in hawaii from all of the volcanic soil that they supplement cattle feed with borax, which helps eliminate it. borax also corrects sex hormones and cures breast and prostate cancer, promotes bone healing, tissue healing, and lead detoxification. it is needed by the parathyroid to make parathyroid hormone, which regulates calcium. when you are boron deficient you make too much and
you get calcium deposits in your joints.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712861/