>>13159092>https://twitter.com/bIackvIvet/status/1415457758795780098?s=20i's seens this before, breddy good 8/10
>https://twitter.com/chaejicheji/status/1409024711732785157?s=20watched it three times wondering which member cheji was supposed to be until i realized it was op stamp, 4/10
ok i sleep now
>>13159094yes indeed, i'd been trying to find a good a-to-z roman podcast forever but everyone seemed to be either overly verbose or a complete schizo trying to analyze history through some new fangled methodology that meant they didn't have to follow the historical narrative but could instead just jump straight into number of tribunes and the amount of latifundia and talk about how those affected rome's development
ok i sleep now
