>>20534096>How did my post (the only post i made, just now) do this? At all?you troons hang out in your discords until it's time to flood us with the exact same demoalization posts in the same kinds of threads over and over. you're probably working from a script, same shit over and over.
>>20534096>Not all of those things are the same. Also, these threads usually don't have many 'tomboys' posted at all. Sometimes it's zero. It's mostly muscled women at various levels of androgeneity, which is not natural to desire, which is what makes it a fetish. It doesn't make you gay, but liking women who are masculine is not natural and was never a thing until modern day.always busting out "no real tomboys" to shit up the thread and the troon logic (picrel)
>>b-b-but what about this historical tale about a guy in 1852 who fell in love with a muscle woman at a local freakshow>No. Just pre-empting such a cope if it exists.the bible says women should be strong, women needing to be weak to be feminine is a modern faggot invention to weaken society
>>20534097>Meant to point out this samefagging.accusing of samefagging, in a thread made by and for tombros, muscle girl appreciators, outdoor girl appreciators, etc who all congregate to the one thread we can have once a week, because you troon demoralizers aren't very smart
