>>11861875...
I met couple of younger women that despite their lack of experiences and proper terminology they still had base concepts of whatever I was talking about because unlike previous generations they don't just silently nod to generalised opinions
they can understand why issue of paedophilia isn't so simple, they can understand why black and white generalisation doesn't work
but thats exactly what you'te doing with women, you're generalising them and prescribing atributes that are not inherent to groups that are far too diverse to generalise
>how uglyI can hardly describe their appearances granted my autism and no experience in "descriptions" but I'll do my best
ugly girls are the kind that have to wear the makeup all the time... but shouldn't show their face in public, the kind where you can't make them look pretty even with expensive seshions that are usually exclusive for weddings and all
the kind that have blatant asimetrical faces, the kind where some part of the face (nose, eyes, eyebrows, teeth, ears eve) stand ouf so grotesqly you can't help but look away
the kind that have a badly inflamed face that makes you wonder under what retarded level of stress this girl is to have boils so bad... and if it isn't stress dear god dear I question if she ever bathes, or what food she eats
the kind that have hair broken so badly for no appeaeant reason despite keeping it combed and ironed
the kind that has visible moustache of glsrring jaw misalignment
>religious equals goodso you're a christian huh? shoild'vr known by your generalisation, see I understand, you were always thaught since youth christians=good, modest, pure; secular folk=bad, corrupt, lust, sodomy, gay, depraved...
