>>11047465>that US intel agencies might be politicized/weaponizeUnderstandable, and they were.
However, my thoughts on mass surveillance have dramatically changed, since seeing how past administrations have WEAPONIZED people.
The dangers surrounding us have grown exponentially, as more and more common folk have become so physically, mentally and emotionally mal-nourished and brainwashed, they trigger so easily.
Add to that the demoralization of values, and the enhancement and increased distribution of corruption in all walks of life.
All that said, having EYES ON, as far as I'm concerned, is not only beneficial, it's crucial to weed out those who are poised, or, embedded, to harm us.
Under administrations such as 45's -assuming we also manage to weed oot sleepers, honest, law-abiding citizens should not have to worry.
>However, along with this I would also like to see newer laws, so crafty laywers and alleged hunam rights orgs, cannot stand in the way of swift justice. I believe we need to put the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens first.My feeling has been, and remains, that the Bill of Rights only faulters in not providing wording that restricts the rights of the criminally inclined, for, in protecting criminals...we void the constitutional rights of honest citizens.
>While this may sound radical, I believe it is sound. Citizens and foreigners who cannot abide by our laws should not have the same rights as Partiots.
All heinous criminal acts should be deemed Unconstitutional, for they are a direct assault to our rights and values.
