>>14103384>Right, so everybody in europe was a 'celt?' According to you, there was NO difference between the latin europeans, slavic europeans, germanic europeans or nordic europeans? They were all just one big tribe of 'celts' and thats it?you are so scientifically illiterate it hurts
> there was NO difference between the latin europeans,Latins are italics, italics split off from the rest of celts in 1200 BC, so 3200 years ago latins and celts were literally the same thing and the ancestors of the romans lived in what is modern day austria
2000 years ago by the time of the roman empire they would have been separate for a thousand years
> slavic europeans,slavic europeans and celtic europeans are the earliest split off between indo european populations, there would have been a difference even quite early on but they were still part of the same civilisation with relatively identical beliefs, society and technology
> germanic europeans or nordic europeans? germanics/nordics are mutts between the natives of scandinavia and the indo europeans celts/slavs, look at this picture to get the tl dr
>>14103381>They were all just one big tribe of 'celts' and thats it?>Really? Which europeans? Slavs and nords arent even caucasians, theyre east asians that evolved a caucasoid phenotypeit's literally the opposite, nords /haplogroup I are caucasians, all aryans, the haplogroup R, are the asians who evolved a caucasoid phenotype
