>>13087310I am fully aware with this and it is a VALID point but I do not really post that much, and I only posted that image a handful of times over the course of a few weeks.
I considered all the logical factors, and when combined with the "coincidences", it becomes illogical.
For example
>If they did not respond to my post within ONE MINUTE, I would not have even made this post. >I would have categorized it as just "weird" that they claim I am obsessed with an image, that they tried to crop; and "accidentally" posted in their thread about another HEAVYILY slided topic(McAfee). 