>>11534931I know, that's exactly what I was getting at. Will you have the patience to finish it?
>by my metric if you called thdm beautiful thrn yes, if you aren't attracted to them.they weren't exactly beatifulThey can still be beautiful. I would call them attractive otherwise. Am I attracted to my mom too, since I think she's beautiful?
Maybe it's all just semantics really. Let's approach this differently then, would you go out to dinner with somebody just because you found them pretty? Maybe her personality is atrocious or maybe you simply find her boring overall, or her views aren't compatible with yours.
>antisocialism isn't an inherent trait true to it's word, instead it is a concept that separates anyone and everyone that does not socislise for any reason That's what it seems to be, yes. But I thought that the actual term only refers to people who are averse to human interaction, any and all sorts of human interaction. And those people I think are extremely rare. Even asexuals want some form of companionship, even if it's not intimate in that way.
>except worse? I'm pretty sure I'd hang myself if I got denied on 100 job applications that I was fit to work atWorse? I'd say if you were to ask out ten girls (you at least somewhat knew beforehand), at least two of those would say yes. Whereas if you were to apply to ten jobs chances are you wouldn't hear back from any of them unless you had years upon years of experience in the field.
>as a guy that wants to write his own shit I really don't want to read books and plagiariseI forgot to reply to this yesterday. It's not necessarily plagiarising if you take a few ideas from one text and either expand on them or approach them differently in your own. People have been doing that since the Greeks.
>>11534442Why would you reply to a three days old reply?
>>11533224thots on this
