>>6446247No it's nothing but pictures. Context you retarded fucking nigger ever heard of that word? Without any explanation of dataset, method of analysis, objective statement, anything this is utter dogshit. Classic /pol/tard pseudoscience, that's not how it works retard.
>>6446157>N°1: When you go to this website, you can immediately see him saying his dataset is based on what women insert into their profile under IDEAL parameters, not who they actually end up dating>>6446172>N°2: Completely unreadable source -> GET FUCKED>>6446189>N°3: The paper quite literally states only 65% of the entire dataset actually PROVIDED an income in the data, all the rest was empty>>6446197>N°4: THIS IS A DATASET FROM SWEDEN. PEOPLE ARE TALL IN SWEDEN YOU STUPID RETARD.>>6446233>N°5: This is not a statistical analysis. THIS IS A BLOG. Jesus christTL;DR: You're a stupid little sperg that never opened a fucking book in his life. You're salty because someone showed you some out of context pictures and you're too much of a pussy to actually work on yourself, so you like to blame other shit instead. So how about you just get your shit together, and do it preferably far away from here, maybe reddit.