>>12210783>It's much simpler to test the flat earth assertion that a dome existssimpler? So wait, are you saying testing space is impossible?
>and more honest than making untestable assumptions about the physical qualities of space.What you're saying is basically this:
"we can't prove space exists so it's up to you to prove the firmament exists because scientifically it seems more plausible and testable".
Not how it works and I'm till not making a claim for either. Shadow chasing is for groundhogs
>>12210790The "imaginary line" is "spacetime", where time; the human measure, magically has properties and acts on other things and so does a vacuum. Truly mystical stuff.
>>12210794So what the fuck is "space"? I hear a lot of people constantly defining it by "what it is not", yet all that tells me is that it "is not" something at all.
