>>10424380>Work together how? You're talking about including women in political solutions. No, I'm saying that our men must learn to lead women again in a social/relationship setting, so that we may convince women to stand behind us in number, so that these women will be there with us at protests, these women will bare our children, so that these women will help us indirectly.
I'm not advocating that women gain any actual political power or influence. I'm just saying, we need to get men to step the fuck up and take control of women, and convert them to supporting our endeavors in such.
Like, it's pretty fucking useful to form a romantic relationship with a woman, get her to believe your politics, which she will then VOTE for certain politicians because of.
I'd rather women not vote at all, but we must work within and abuse our current system, so that we one day may replace it.
>How is that not feminism? It is. Let us be clear about what feminism. Any system that includes women in policymaking is, by definition, a feminist system. I agree, I don't want women in policy-making, I want them purely in supporting roles of men on our side.
>The simple fact is, if we win, women will follow us. If we lose, they won't.True
>We don't need to enlist their help in changing policies, or overthrowing the governments that enforce the wrong policies.Never said we did
>We need them to resume their rightful place in our society. True
>And that must be done by force, because there is no other way to get them back in place.That's where i think you're probably attempting this in an extremely short-sighted and pipe-dreamish fashion. How are you going to get that force? There's no one men of such far-right or traditionalist political views will ever gain power without a violent revolution (which the right wing aren't very good at) or a military coup, (the right are much better at this, but good luck hoping this will happen in America or other modern Western societies)
