>>6465042>if you want to fight for board's dominancy, do so with anything that's worth people's attentionIt's not like thousands of threads asking random questions with a cirno OP(so it gets mass bumped) is considered quality
>Show me how many frog threads actually had a one or at least a common sense behind their placement (apart of comfy and a bunch of others, they are coole, just green).You'd be right, apu threads have no common sense behind them, but they're merely shitposts, again, just to send cirnofrens into rage, by mass bumping apu it's kinda counter attacking the cirno bumpcult
>By cropping their shit into /bant/ and calling it being here forever is degenerating, ignorant and absolutely immoral.I believe those people are trolling to get (You)s from cirnofiends
>If you wanna, then make a change, I would love to see Apu actually getting into /bant/'s structure by some actually interesting posters, not just a bunch of deviant proxy fags not even knowing how's their parental stuff working.Agreed, wojak gets tons of edits everyday, apu is ignored, it'd be nice to get some wojak tier edits on ol' apu
>Yeah, but when a thread dies with lesser than even 10 replies, it's just bad for the board's quality.You know what's also bad? A thread dying with 400+ replies, all of them being "bump"
when is the next happi dai coming
