>>19454425>Roman's themselves who were completely indifferent to Christ described the man multiple times in multiple different records.They only mention he existed and had a cult around him.
>And yet in every other instance the shroud was proven to be unfalsifiable in terms of DNA found, carbon dating, et cetera. And plenty of kikes will lie their asses to disprove such things, like you right now.There is no chain of custody, how could there be when it was supposedly taken from a tomb which provably did not exist, as it would have been the biggest pilgrimage site of the Earliest Christianity all the way into modernity, instead the Church of the Holy Sepulcher was founded by Constantine 300 years after Jesus' death. Secondly, the Shroud is in church custody and few people get to work on it so those studies can't be replicated. The blood flows are wrong, the image is distorted, and on art depicting it in earlier centuries was it more vivid than it is today indicating the use of pigments. Additionally someone admitted to forging it in a time were forging fake relics was very common. The shroud is fake. Sorry.
