>>19369924i have literally said that i am willing to expand upon my reasonings and provide necessary verses if asked and i also stated that i had to shorten my introduction as to fit the words, both my OP and my first reply reached the 2000 character limit. I am willing both to hear your side and expand upon my words but so far you have neither asked me for further clarification or added anything of value of your own, you have simply insulted me, which leads me to believe that you are bluffing and are simply hoping that lurkers will blindly believe your slanderous nonsense. seriously buddy, have some decorum about you, you are shaming yourself.
>>19369927again, you post nothing but ceaseless insults, please, try to argue against any of the points provided, i don't think you can considering you are resorting to insults.
Your english also makes no sense and is often vague.
