>>5950107>>5950133Now here you start to touch on something interesting, time itself, do you not? Given casuality started with something, a unified cause spreading into what we see today. Wouldn't this drive then in itself be time, would it's "time" not be that it moves forward, always, that causes are still followed by effects? So as you put it, if in a star this web would be massive, would it then "take longer"? But isn't it so if what is being manifested is this drive in itself, then in relation to what would it slow down because of high demands? It must surely be so that it would be less if the "activity" lessened, again I think this is where my fear for "constant acceleration" comes in, you see this is where it gets more and more "something" as while if it would go in the other direction it would get closer to nothing. As is then "reality" or the universe or whatever we call that which we deem to exist in relation to that which we say does not exist, as something that wouldn't be - this activity, this drive could it then be seen to have various levels of activity, would it be seen on various levels. Let's say this activity is in itself what we know as the universe, that which we say exist and "nothing" would in return be that of which has none of this, none whatsoever - it would in opposit to "loud" as I said earlier, be "silent". Maybe the louder you picture this, the more out of control you feel of it's power, maybe that's where my fear stems from.
