>>19294308Exactly.
https://whenvictimsrule.blogspot.com/search/label/01_IntroductionARCHIVE LINK:
https://archive.vn/8rBlF"We are all socialized in Western society to resist judging any individual by his or her ethnic/group association. It's a noble ideal: Why prejudge anyone about anything? Let any individual be completely evaluated upon his or her respective merits. America is educationally, and legally, configured as a "tolerant" society, champion of a variety of multicultural perspectives. As reasonable as this may seem, however, there can be a profound double standard subliminally at work here. What about when the "individual we must not prejudge" is part of a subcommunity that itself prejudges all who are not part of that group's boundaries of identity, a group that consistently acts by its self-protective, self-expansive biases? Is it "prejudicial" to criticize individuals who maintain -- actively or passively -- such group allegiance, within, and transcending, the American matrix? And is it not morally reasonable, and in fact morally necessary, to criticize any collectivity, to the degree it deviates, at core, from the inter-ethnic tolerant, and universalistic, ethic of the American sociopolitical framework? And what about when such a group can, alternately or collectively, self-configure as a racial, ethnic, religious, nationalist, and political organization? Does such a community merit categorical immunity from criticism?"
WARNING: that book has a flaw which is that the author doesn't know about the official version of the holocaust being a fraud. To fix that flaw here are some resources:
https://archive.vn/B2PEhAlso:
"Nobody ever says "let's not blame entire groups" when the zionists or woke trash attack White people.
They ONLY say that when White people start fighting back against their jewish oppressors" - Anonymous
