>>14451131You mentioning bunny girls in the post I replied to, but I guess it was a pointless tangent for me to go on.
>>14451142Did you know that yuri has its roots in 20th Century Japanese literature aimed at school girls? At the time it was forbidden for a book meant for them to feature any form of romance so the writers substituted that with "sisterly relationships", which had all the marks of romance without any sort of physicality. These relationships were also described as the purest sort there is, which happens to be the exact same things yuri enthusiasts say. They used to have illustrations too.