>>5087093Read this, it’s a more in-depth explanation.
>Luxemburgism is a happy medium between authoritarian state communism and anarcho-communism. It features a communist economy, where the workers control businesses and industries democratically, share in their ownership, and elect their leaders, but its political framework is that of a multiparty democracy with delegatory representation, far more similar to the representative democracy most westerners are familiar with, or to popular democracy. This is a recipe for a decentralized, planned economy, where people express their needs and wants known through the limited central system democratically, establishing rule of law and mediating between social and economic forces, and also express their will as workers through democratic participation in governing their workplaces. If a need isn’t being met, the people can use the central government to incentivize, request, or otherwise negotiate for the economic institutions capable of fulfilling that need to do so.Advocates of this system are Communists who argue that it has many of the benefits of Leninism’s ability to organize people effectively to accomplish goals such as building a well-resourced national program to benefit people, or actually constructing a socialist or communist system, and to impose discipline to prevent things we all agree are bad, such as rape, murder, or exploitation, while still maintaining many of Anarchocommunism’s goals of allowing individual freedom and agency, and preventing a central power from becoming a new ruling class (in anarchism’s case there is no central power, but in Luxemburgism’s case, that central power is directly answerable to the masses and acts only as a tool of the democratic will of the majority)
In other words, it seeks to be the best of both worlds
